Thursday, April 28, 2016

Mindful Meditation in Everyday Life



I attended the first annual Renew & Refuel Mental Wellness Conference at San Diego State University on Monday.  Renew and Refuel is one of the SDSU programs funded by the Student Success Fee, and was held at the Prebys Student Center at SDSU.  It consisted of a keynote speaker and two hour-long breakout sessions.  I attended the Mindfulness and Reflection breakout session led by Dr. Erik Conklin.

Dr. Conklin is a certified Compassion Cultivation Facilitator coming from Stanford’s Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education.  He gave us an overview of mindfulness meditation and its neurological, psychological and physical benefits as well as an introduction to the philosophy of mindfulness.  In his terms, it is “paying attention to the present moment with a non-judgmental openness, curiosity and a willingness to ‘be with what is.’”  He described that non-judgmental openness as being like a flashlight.  Sometimes practice of mindfulness meditation will illuminate unpleasant things within ourselves, which he likened to that flashlight illuminating a “present” a new puppy leaves on the floor.  If we are adopting the mindfulness philosophy, we can both recognize the truth and hold back from judging it- we can say “yep that’s dog crap alright” without scolding ourselves for being bad dog owners or getting angry at the dog for not knowing how expensive the carpet is.

During the session, Dr. Conklin led us in a few mini-exercises in mindful meditation that would be easily applicable in school settings.  The first was a mental exercise he called “STOP,” which stands for Stop, Take a breath, Observe and Proceed with intention in mind.  He encouraged us to employ this whenever we get upset (in traffic, with our significant others, in class, etc.).  Observing and proceeding with intention mean taking stock of our emotions at the time, maybe realizing how angry we are with our significant other, and then taking some time to figure out what our intentions are in that discussion.  For example, we may intend to hurt someone’s feelings (in which case we should likely change our behavior) or we may intend to make someone understand something that was hurtful.  Either way, using the STOP exercise can help clarify our emotions and our intentions in heated moments.

After rehearsing STOP we practiced something known as mindful eating.  Dr. Conklin distributed small cups of raisins and chocolate chips and instructed us to hold each one in our mouths for 30 seconds just observing how our bodies respond to the food and then to chew each raisin or chocolate 30 times before swallowing.  The point of this exercise was to slow down our minds and bodies and to restrain our impulses long enough to savor our food.  Dr. Conklin recommended this practice with people with unhealthy relationships to food, from overweight or obese people to people with anorexia or bulimia.

In a handout Dr. Conklin provided research article citations on the effectiveness of mindfulness.  Most of the articles focused on brain composition changes observed through fMRI scans after sustained daily practice of meditation but one article specifically discussed the efficacy of short-term meditation training like we practiced in the breakout session.  The article, by twelve researchers at Dalian University of Technology in China led by Yi-Yuan Tang, found improvements in attention and self-regulation among students who received 5 20-minute meditation training sessions.  Although the article did not specifically test the meditation exercises employed in the breakout session, it supports the use of such sessions for students in schools.

Overall I found the interventions useful and simple and I could see myself using them with students, particularly at the elementary level.  The mindful eating exercise would be great to do with older elementary students because it could hold their attention and seems easier for restless students to engage with than quietly practicing restful breathing.  The STOP exercise seems like it would only work with students with good enough emotion regulation and executive function to stop themselves in the middle of a heated moment.  It would be interesting to see if there is any research specifically on the STOP exercise and what age group it was conducted on.

--AJ Newcombe

Documents from the session:




No comments:

Post a Comment